Talk with Prof leads to two conclusions:

1) Reconciliation is only good for me, not for reality.

2) If I'd name it incident instead of guilt, it would bring a bit more objectivity.


The concept of tactical voting is getting a bit more difficult, it seems that tactical on one hand emphasise on the rationality of voters, short term instrumental. The situation of PR seems to differ a little from the usual understanding of it, which put forte over the short term rationality. What if the voters already had in mind the sum of party's strategic planning?