The more I am digging into my readings, the more I realise it would be impossible to prove tactical voting by mere deduction. It seems that the theoretical basis of evidence are not enough to support the claim in this aspect. It would be better to explain a bit the topic, and place tactical voting under such a category: The Proportional Disrepresentation: Investigation into 2012 Legco Election with Focus on Electoral Behaviour.
I quit facebook but just keeping it a bit to make sure everybody thinks I am not insame or something. But then I am generally tired of it, like a blackhole, all the things in my life that is distracting me. Xanga is the same thing. Hkgolden is okay in the sense sometimes you find good posts and you read human nature in it, just that I am noticing too the proportion of rubbish in it. When will people realise that they are amusing themselves to death?
沒有留言:
張貼留言